data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/757d7/757d7bf9b55122ef4fed0ae243a865628b52692a" alt="Waterworld movie review"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82767/827675bed7d853c05bc63bdcbc0f79751fe63709" alt="waterworld movie review waterworld movie review"
If this sounds familiar to you, that's because Reynolds' film is essentially George Miller's Mad Max remade by Greenpeace it's almost uncanny how much Reynolds and screenwriters Peter Rader and David Twohy have borrowed from Miller's film (and, going further back, several Kurosawa epics and, of course, Shane), so much so that it sometimes grates on your nerves.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cec05/cec050a17556f6c4350e762952c58532325f7ea2" alt="waterworld movie review waterworld movie review"
When the Mariner, after an attack by the Smokers, is unwillingly pressed into aid by a stranded woman and her young female charge (Tripplehorn and Majorino, respectively), he must choose between a solitary life on the sea or the more noble (albeit less palatable) route of Savior of Humankind. Sailing, rowing, and, occasionally flying across this vast, murky expanse are the last footholds of humanity: the Atollers, who have banded together to create a semblance of normalcy atop a vast, floating community the Smokers (so named because of their penchant for cigarettes where, though, do they get all these non-soggy cancer sticks?), a vile group of marauders led by the predictably over-the-top Hopper and - our hero - the Mariner (Costner), a lone, web-footed scavenger who cruises the ocean searching for barterable goods (like, say, dirt).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33a14/33a14fc0f630f8199b4d74f659f821e0374d0814" alt="waterworld movie review waterworld movie review"
Set in a future where an unknown cataclysm has melted the polar ice caps, Waterworld is just that: an environment sans terra firma. That makes it all the more pleasant to find out that the film is actually quite good, as far as gargantuan summer blockbusters go (certainly, it's vastly more entertaining and technically superior to the sounds-like-a-threat-to-me Batman Forever). With a budget hovering around the $200 million mark and a backlog of cast and crew horror stories so colossal they make Cimino's Heaven's Gate-woes pale in comparison (the hurricane that destroyed the main set was a nice touch), Waterworld has been a project under siege almost from day one. If you can work your way past the monumental anti-hype and ill-will surrounding this most expensive of all films, you'll find Reynolds and Costner's enfant terrible of a movie isn't so terrible after all.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/757d7/757d7bf9b55122ef4fed0ae243a865628b52692a" alt="Waterworld movie review"